Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Take Charge Assignment Ideas

1. So far our discussions of current events in the media have been very entertaining. I think this assignment sounds interesting because we can express opinions on our own interests in the media. It is very intriguing to analyze the world around me and how different media affects our own opinions. I have not kept that up to date with the news, so this is definatley helping me to become more aware of social interests.

2. After reading many of the news headlines on various internet web sites it has become evident to me that heath and celebrities dominate the tabloids. I think that the issues with health food and obesity are becoming a major obbsession. It would be interesting to analyze the the difference between what the media suggests we do to help our health and what is actually happening to our health. In one article I was reading, the writer said that they may put a ban on opening any new fast food restaurants in LA, but will this actually happen? Also, people today are obsessed with celebrity gossip. They are more worried about celebrity life than their own. It seems odd that we care more about the fact that Brittney Spears' shaved her head than the fact that there have been breakthroughs in curing diseases and that hundreds of people are still dying in Iraq. Everyday people find themselves trying to compare their lives to that of the rich and famous rathing than worrying about major problems. This is where reality television has become a major factor because normal people feel that they too take part in the fame just like the celebrities in Hollywood. Everyone tries to reach out to feel that they are a part of something fun and exctiting that pulls them away from their own average life.

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Trust in the Media

1. I thought the article, “Which Media Do You Trust?,” was fairly relevant to our society today. It made me think about what types of media I trust and how I go about finding out the truth in the news. I agreed with the argument, people trust different forms of media like blogs on a “case to case” basis, because that is very similar to the way I judge the media. It was easy to read because it was well organized with plenty of data to support the facts.
2. “Which Media Do You Trust?” by Mark Glaser claims that people value certain types of media over others because of experiences that they encounter in their daily lives. Slowly blogs have earned more credibility, but only certain writers may actually release plausible blogs. Glaser uses statistics, which show that only 25% of people trust blogs, while national television ranks at 82%. Although these numbers are distanced, such a broad survey may only have reached out to a few people who have experienced bad encounters with specific blogs. Blogs tend to illustrate more opinions than facts, so this definitely brings down the rankings; if everyone who took the survey had read a blog of a well credited source the results would have been much different. The article was supported well with numerical statistics displaying people’s trust in media and it is evident that more factual sources receive higher rankings. The live news shows real coverage of events, which are not distorted. In today’s society many people don’t believe things until they actually see it. Newspapers and internet sites could show distorted images, which don’t grasp the full picture. I would have used a counterargument involving crediting a blog source in a research paper in college. Many professors may not have allowed such a source because it is not necessarily accurate and subject to bias. Overall the article is well supported and takes into account the logic of most people in reference to the media.